Dear Clint,

I would like to illustrate that the bombing of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon is the result of bad foreign policy that we have maintained for many years that now bears its predicted fruit. George Washington made a farewell address to Congress that was 11 pages long ending with the last 4 pages warning of foreign entanglements, and establishing favorite nations. I will try to quote the best of this lengthy warning which is nurishment to the soul at this time.

"Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct. And can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it?

"In the execution of such a plan nothing is more essential that that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded, and that in place of them just and amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur.

"Hence frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation prompted by ill will and resentment sometimes impels to war the government contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject. At other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility, instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations has been the victim.

"As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot.

"Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike for another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil the even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.

"The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.

"Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the cause of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.

"Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?

"It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world, so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But in my opinion it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.

"Taking care always to keep ourselves by suitable establishments on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.

"There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is a illusion which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard."1

Many Christians today support our attachment to Israel as if it were a command of God upon all and as if we could in some way divert the end time revelation already given by God himself. I would also like to show that this attachment, supporting an Israel if it had existed, was not the theology of early America. A sermon entitled "Nineveh's Repentance and Deliverance" by Joseph Sewall (given in Boston in 1740 before the Governor and Representatives of Massachusetts-Bay Dec. 3) illustrates the patriot view of Israel at this period:

"God said to his people, If you will not be reformed, but will walk contrary to me, then will I also walk contrary to you, and will punish you seven times for your sins. And God fulfilled his word. They mocked the Messengers of God, and despised his Words, and misused his Prophets, until the Wrath of the Lord arose against his People, till there was not Remedy, 2Chron. 36. 16. Jerusalem and the Temple were destroyed by fire, and GOD'S people led into captivity to Babylon. And after their merciful restoration, when they had filled up the measure of their sins by disobeying and crucifying the Lord of Glory, and then by rejecting the offers of the gospel made to them by his apostles, the wrath of GOD came upon them to the uttermost by the Romans, and they are made an execration and a curse unto this day."

What has changed the condition of the Jewish people since 1740? They have a home that was established in 1917 by the British conquest of Palestine. At the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo, June 18, 1815, Mr. Bauer, a Jewish banker (aka Rothchild) bought the entire debt of England for one-tenth its value. His courier reached the stock market before the British courier with the news of victory and Rothchild began selling his government bonds with a saddened face.

The Brits began to sell their bonds fast. Rothchild kept this up until mid-afternoon when he turned around and bought all the debt of England by the end of the day. How about that for insider trading?In 1917 Lord Balfour set up the first civil government in British Palestine under High Commissioner, Sir Herbert Samuel, a Jewish statesman. Palestine had been in the hands of Arabs and Arab Muslims for 1400 years prior to that (7th Century AD until 1917).

In 1913 Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act. By 1933 a minority of New York Bankers with ties to Rothchild and Warburg of Europe through J.P. Morgan, established what Rep. McFadden called a "dictatorship over banking in America"2 in the Congressional Record of 1933. It is called the Federal Reserve System. It is the third central bank in America's history. We have this same system today and it is a private monopoly over banking and currency in America. It is still operated by a small minority of New York bankers handed down over the years to its successors who understand the plan. Andrew Jackson, U.S. President from 1828 to 1836, destroyed the second central bank at great risk to himself and the nation. He had been elected to do that very thing by a landslide but the director, Mr. Biddle, would not step down at the bank's dissolution by Congress. Mr. Biddle tightened the credit and crashed the economy of the United States and blamed it on Jackson. In the end Jackson became a hero and the head of the Bank of the United States died in prison as a criminal.

Now, is it becoming a little more clear how our American history has gone from the warnings of foreign entanglements to the blatant endorsement and favored status of certain nations at the angering of others? We are no longer an independent sovereign nation. We have become the slave of international bankers and we serve them and their world-wide plans of domination.Would you like to risk a guess at what religious persuasion our monetary masters are? Would you like to hazard a guess at why we have such an attachment to England and Israel? Would you like to hazard a guess as to why almost every provision of our U.S. Constitution has been in violation for 68 years? It is to protect an illegal currency and an illegal monopoly over the American economy.

Now as for what I would do to better the situation. I would do the only thing possible. Return the land and people to law and order under the U.S. Constitution. God will not excuse a people who do not keep their own law while they seek "justice" for others.

Sincerely,Ronald F. Avery



1. James D. Richardson, A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents (Bureau of National Literature 1897) 213-216

2. Mr. McFadden,War and Emergency Powers - Congressional Record-House, p.80, (American Agriculture Movement Campo, Colorado) Exhibit 38