Yesterday, Bush was praising the
“work” and “progress” being made by his troops in Iraq. All the commonly owned
“networks” made a landmark out of the 2000th Bushian soldier killed
doing Bush’s good work. Bush said “we had more work to do.” But he said on this
day of the 2000th soldier killed, Iraq now has a constitution. He
also warned that even though they have a new constitution, the number of
“insurgent” attacks will increase. Attacks against occupying Bushian troops
rose from 60 per day a month or so ago to about 100 per day now.
To establish the “rule of law” in
Iraq, the “Bill of Rights” in their constitution might say something like, “All
courts shall be open, and every person for an injury done him, in his lands,
goods, person or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law,” and “To
guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare
that everything in this “Bill of Rights” is excepted out of the general powers
of government, and shall forever remain inviolate, and all laws contrary
thereto shall be void.” Now then suppose that the Iraqi legislature passed a
law that said “The Nation of Iraq presumes to possess sovereignty and immunity
over the subjects or citizens of Iraq to kill them, and steal and
destroy all their liberties and possessions of every kind without recourse to
the courts unless waived by Iraqi statute or Iraqi congressional resolution.”
What would an Iraqi think about his new nation and its constitution?
Welcome to Texas friend. The first provision, “all
courts shall be open, etc.,” is Article 1 Sec 13 of the Texas “Bill of Rights,” and the second “To
guard against transgressions, etc.,” is Art 1 Sec 29 of same. And the law that
was passed by the Legislature of Texas that presumes sovereign immunity to kill
the citizens of Texas
and destroy or steal all their liberties and possessions without judicial
recourse unless waived is the Texas Tort Claims Act of 1969.
On 10/14/05 the Supreme Court of
Texas “denied” my motion for rehearing challenging the TTCA and its unlawful
presumption against the sovereign citizens of Texas
who formed Texas
for their own benefit. That decision ended my $6 million law suit against GBRA
et al, which was “dismissed with prejudice” and never heard before a jury
because of the State’s unlawful “presumption of sovereign immunity to harm the
Citizens without recourse” under the TTCA.
How can “our” “government” in “Texas” and the “U.S.” care about an Iraqi
constitution? They don’t care about nor uphold their own. You may read all
about this at www.PostWTC.com/frame-3.html
where every court document is posted.
Ronald F. Avery